2007
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4352613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative study of signal decay due to magnetic susceptibility interfaces: MRI simulations and experiments

Abstract: Characterization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts is required in a wide range of MRI studies. Experiments with a 0.2T magnet and MRI simulations were used to assess the signal decay over echo time at different pixel sizes in the case of air-water interfaces. The specific experimental signal modulation which was reproduced in simulation was interpreted. Concordance between simulation and experiments should make possible further studies of magnetic susceptibility effects with more complex objects as in molec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the ball is thrown forward with as much force as possible, so that it falls within the throwing sector. The reliability obtained [85] through a test-retest is r = 0.98, and the validity of the drop jump test was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), which yielded a score of 0.98, indicating consistency between the means of each throwing mode (standing, kneeling, sitting, one-handed). The correlation coefficient was also calculated, resulting in a score of r = 0.49, with a significant p-value of <0.01 [67].…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the ball is thrown forward with as much force as possible, so that it falls within the throwing sector. The reliability obtained [85] through a test-retest is r = 0.98, and the validity of the drop jump test was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), which yielded a score of 0.98, indicating consistency between the means of each throwing mode (standing, kneeling, sitting, one-handed). The correlation coefficient was also calculated, resulting in a score of r = 0.49, with a significant p-value of <0.01 [67].…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%