2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative study of mass transfer in megasonic micro electroforming based on mass transfer coefficient: Simulation and experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voids were found in the core of the microstructures with lateral feature sizes smaller than 70 µm, due to a restricted mass transfer in the microcavities of the mold. However, it is believed that microstructures with finer feature sizes and higher aspect ratios can be achieved by further improvements in microscale mass transfer, such as ultrasonic microelectroforming [35], jet electrodeposition [36], microelectroforming under boiling conditions [37], and pulsed current microelectroforming [38].…”
Section: Feature Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voids were found in the core of the microstructures with lateral feature sizes smaller than 70 µm, due to a restricted mass transfer in the microcavities of the mold. However, it is believed that microstructures with finer feature sizes and higher aspect ratios can be achieved by further improvements in microscale mass transfer, such as ultrasonic microelectroforming [35], jet electrodeposition [36], microelectroforming under boiling conditions [37], and pulsed current microelectroforming [38].…”
Section: Feature Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the formability of microelectroforming is usually restricted by the limited mass transfer in the high-aspect-ratio microcavities of molds [7,8]. Extensive studies have been conducted to improve the mass transfer in the microelectroforming process, such as adding external fields [9][10][11] and changing the current waveform [12,13]. The enhancement effect of these methods decreases with the increase of the aspect ratio of the microstructures, and they have little influence on the mass transfer when the aspect ratio of microcavities is greater than 5 [11,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study demonstrates that mass transfer in the micro/ nano cavity is mainly by diffusion and internal vortex flow, and as the width decreases from 2.5 to 0.5 mm, fewer streamlines enter the region near the inlet. Zhao 14 quantitatively studied the mass transfer during megasonic (1 MHz) micro electroforming. The simulation results show that as the aspect ratio of the microchannel increases from 1 : 5 to 5 : 1, the corresponding mass transfer coefficient which is a diffusion rate constant related to the mass transfer rate decreases by an order of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%