2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Studies of microstructural phase transformation in Nickel–Titanium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e.g. [19,88,55,38], and references therein). We shall call attention to specific experimental observations and make comparisons to our own results in the chapters that follow.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. [19,88,55,38], and references therein). We shall call attention to specific experimental observations and make comparisons to our own results in the chapters that follow.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the length scales of microstructure interfaces in an SMA routinely span 10 nm to 1 mm, making it difficult to use a single measurement technique to simultaneously observe all of the critical features during micro-structure evolution (Li, 2002;Zhang et al, 2000;Liu et al, 1999Liu et al, , 2000Inamura et al, 2012;Nishida et al, 1988Nishida et al, , 2012Coughlin et al, 2012;Norfleet et al, 2009). Second, most experimental techniques for observing microstructure evolution across the relevant length scales are limited to surface observations (Gall et al, 2002;Kimiecik et al, 2013Kimiecik et al, , 2016Laplanche et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2015;Shaw, 2000;Paul et al, 2017) and typically cannot measure the out-of-plane deformations that result from these three-dimensional deformation mechanisms. Third, the three-dimensional measurement techniques that do exist are either destructive and prohibit in situ measurements (Hornbuckle et al, 2015;Henrie et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2015) or are averaged over millions to billions of grains (Stebner et al, 2013;Dunand et al, 1996;Khalil-Allafi et al, 2004;Buhrer et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of non-destructive in situ experiments is providing data that elucidate physics at the length scales of micromechanical theories. In situ microscopy techniques, together with digital image correlation, provide a means for visually studying the bridges between microscopic scales and macroscopic responses and are unequivocally well suited for observing films, strips, sheets, and other geometries where surface effects dominate the structural response of components [9][10][11][12]. In situ neutron diffraction, on the other hand, provides a means to simultaneously probe the conglomerate responses of millions to billions of crystals in bulk samples of several millimeters to centimeters in size, concurrent with macroscopic behaviors [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%