2010
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative structure–activity relationship study on the inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase

Abstract: A quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) analysis was performed on the K i values of a series of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors. Six molecular descriptors selected by CODESSA software were used as inputs to perform heuristic method (HM) and support vector machine (SVM). The results obtained by SVM were compared with those obtained by the HM. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) for the training set given by HM and SVM were 0.555 and 0.404, respectively, which shows that the performanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous other chemometric methods in the literature including partial least squares, principal component analysis, artificial neural network, support vector machines, and multiple linear regression . The MVRF methodology was chosen over these other options in part because of the ease in which it can handle data nonlinearities as well as complex response vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous other chemometric methods in the literature including partial least squares, principal component analysis, artificial neural network, support vector machines, and multiple linear regression . The MVRF methodology was chosen over these other options in part because of the ease in which it can handle data nonlinearities as well as complex response vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of these software has been presented in Reference 6. Descriptor selection can be done by variable selection methods such as heuristic method 7, 8, factor analysis (FA) 9, 10 and genetic algorithm (GA) 10, 11. GA‐based variable‐selection approaches are more convenient than other variable selection approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%