2017
DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2017.1320585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative structure–activity relationship study of amide mosquito repellents

Abstract: A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study on 43 amide repellents was carried out by the heuristic method in order to reveal the correlations between molecular parameters of these amides and their repellency against Aedes aegypti. Sketches and optimizations of molecular structures were achieved by the Gaussian software package. Generation and screening of molecular parameters were accomplished using CODESSA 2.7.10 software. The leave-one-out method was applied for the model validation. The res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repellent activity values were retrieved from Wang et al . for a set of 43 carboxamides: they correspond to the logarithm of the minimum effective dosages (i. e. MED), after conversion into μmol/dm 2 of the results published by Oliferenko et al ., which were originally reported in μmol/cm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Repellent activity values were retrieved from Wang et al . for a set of 43 carboxamides: they correspond to the logarithm of the minimum effective dosages (i. e. MED), after conversion into μmol/dm 2 of the results published by Oliferenko et al ., which were originally reported in μmol/cm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Log MED activity expressed in μmol/dm 2 covers 2.88 log units (from 0.5185 to 3.3979). The explanation of the conversion of the data from μmol/cm 2 to μmol/dm 2 (resulting in a shift of the reactivity by a factor of 100 in the expression of MED values compared to those modelled by Oliferenko) was not justified by Wang and colleagues . This change in the unit of the endpoint is probably an untended mistake of the authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations