2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative structure–activity relationship prediction of blood-to-brain partitioning behavior using support vector machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, data-driven approaches can be useful, because strong mechanistic understanding is not required for these approaches. The relevance of such empirical, data-driven modeling for predicting partitioning into the blood-brain barrier has already been widely demonstrated (13,(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, data-driven approaches can be useful, because strong mechanistic understanding is not required for these approaches. The relevance of such empirical, data-driven modeling for predicting partitioning into the blood-brain barrier has already been widely demonstrated (13,(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check for actual predictive capability of the developed models, the dataset for each endpoint was divided prior to model development into a training set (∼70 % of compounds) used for model development and a test set (∼30 % of compounds) used for external validation. Sorted response [Dataset Division GUI 1.2, Version‐1.2, Kolkata, India, 2017; Software available at http://dtclab.webs.com/software‐tools], Euclidean distance and Kennard‐Stone techniques (available at http://dtclab.webs.com/software‐tools) were used for splitting the respective datasets into training and test sets. In the Kennard‐Stone algorithm, at first, two compounds with the highest distance (we have utilized Euclidean distance as a measure of distance) between them are placed in the training set, and the remaining training set compounds are then selected by finding maximum of the minimum distances between the selected training set compounds and the remaining compounds of the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three techniques namely SVM, BPNN and MLR are used in the present study. [88][89][90] For the present study n-support vector regression and 3-support vector regression based on LIBSVM are considered, and in each case linear, polynomial, sigmoid, and radial basis functions are used. Support vector machine (SVM).…”
Section: Molecular Structural Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%