1965
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/45.6.562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Strength Changes with Test Repetitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the above, the role of motor learning in improving muscular performance has been shown in different studies 9, 19,24-27. For example, a familiarization session performed one day before the main assessment improved the isokinetic testing reproducibility in older adults 11.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In accordance with the above, the role of motor learning in improving muscular performance has been shown in different studies 9, 19,24-27. For example, a familiarization session performed one day before the main assessment improved the isokinetic testing reproducibility in older adults 11.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…If the 15 wrist flexion trials were spread over the same day, five per session for three sessions separated by several hours, no strength gains were elicited (Kroll, 1963b). Cross-validation of these findings has been made by other investigators on the knee extensor muscle group by Schenck and Forward (1965), Hood and Forward (1965). Lagasse, Tremblay, and Pageau (1977).…”
Section: Quick Jumps In Strengthmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…If there was a physiological adaptation, such as a change in muscle fibre cross-sectional area, detraining would have occurred during the rest intervals (Mujika and Padilla, 2001). There are several studies that report a similar phenomenon for maximal isometric contractions of the wrist flexors (Kroll, 1963), knee extensors (Hood and Forward, 1965;Knight and Kamen, 2001;Schenck and Forward, 1965;Warshal, 1979), plantar flexors (Kamen, 1983), elbow extensors (Gabriel et al, 2001b), and several intrinsic finger muscles (Kamen et al, 1995;Patten et al, 2001). It appears to be a robust observation: only a few contractions were required to significantly improve the strength of a muscle through familiarization.…”
Section: Elbow Flexion Torquementioning
confidence: 94%