2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative strain-specific detection ofLactobacillus rhamnosusGG in human faecal samples by real-time PCR

Abstract: Aims:  To develop a strain‐specific rapid assay for identification and quantification of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in human faecal samples. Methods and Results:  A unique random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) band of the L. rhamnosus GG strain was isolated and sequenced. Strain‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and probes were designed based on the sequence. Quantification was performed by the real‐time PCR using a fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) system. The specificity of the as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…quantification based on PCR detection of nucleic acids is increasingly being used (11,(23)(24)(25). Here, we confirmed that the RAPD technique is one of the best methods for developing strain-specific primers for use in qPCR analysis.…”
Section: Fujimoto and Watanabesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…quantification based on PCR detection of nucleic acids is increasingly being used (11,(23)(24)(25). Here, we confirmed that the RAPD technique is one of the best methods for developing strain-specific primers for use in qPCR analysis.…”
Section: Fujimoto and Watanabesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…LGG_00154 encodes a hypothetical membrane associated protein, designated map, located outside LGGISL1,2 (locus 168611 to 168105). Moreover, LGG_00154 is located on an amplicon previously selected for specific identification of L. rhamnosus GG (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three technical replicates from three biological samples were performed for each time point. Two sets of primers were employed, the pair srtC1-for (5=-AGTGCGACTATTAGCTTTA-3=) and srtC1-rev (5=-GGATCTTGT GACCTTAATG-3=) and a GG-specific primer pair (29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%