2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative strain analysis and growth mode of pulsed laser deposited epitaxial CoFe2O4 thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From first view, one could anticipate that stress effects on unit‐cell metrics and bond topology could be more relevant in oxide‐based open structures, such as the spinel, than in the more densely packed perovskite structure. Probably for this reason, the Poisson ratio of spinel‐based thin films has recently received much attention 19–21. Somehow in agreement with views just described, it has been reported that thin films of CoFe 2 O 4, a prototypical spinel‐ferrite oxide, grown on a perovskite (SrTiO 3 ) substrate, could be auxetic, i.e., display a negative Poisson ratio ( ν < 0) 19.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…From first view, one could anticipate that stress effects on unit‐cell metrics and bond topology could be more relevant in oxide‐based open structures, such as the spinel, than in the more densely packed perovskite structure. Probably for this reason, the Poisson ratio of spinel‐based thin films has recently received much attention 19–21. Somehow in agreement with views just described, it has been reported that thin films of CoFe 2 O 4, a prototypical spinel‐ferrite oxide, grown on a perovskite (SrTiO 3 ) substrate, could be auxetic, i.e., display a negative Poisson ratio ( ν < 0) 19.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…where b is the magnitude of the Burgers vector, f is the bulk lattice mismatch, v is Poisson's ratio, α is the angle between the dislocation line and its Burgers vector, and λ is the angle between the slip direction and the Burgers vector. Taking f = 0.038, v = 0.26 [61], b = 4.195 Å, α = π/2, and λ = 0 [62], h c ∼ 5 nm, which is comparable to the shell thicknesses obtained from micromagnetic simulations and SANS. We expect variation of the displacement field toward the center of a pillar of a magnetostrictive material like the CFO will produce nonuniform magnetization and the length scales of the displacement field and magnetic nonuniformity will be related.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The fact that the lowest energy planes of perovskites and spinels ({001} in the former and {111} in the latter) differ is likely the driving force for the reported columnar growth. 24,31 It could be tempting to argue that defective intercolumnar areas could constitute low energy paths for the diffusion of the small Ti 4+ ions. Indeed, as mentioned above, Mg 2+ interdiffusion between MgO substrates and some ferrites had been documented; [10][11][12][13][14][15]32 therefore, Ti 4+ being smaller than Mg 2+ , it should not be a surprise to observe Ti migration through CFO as found here in CS, CS 1 M and CS 2 M samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%