2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-014-0765-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Stochastic Homogenization of Elliptic Equations in Nondivergence Form

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce a new method for studying stochastic homogenization of elliptic equations in nondivergence form. The main application is an algebraic error estimate, asserting that deviations from the homogenized limit are at most proportional to a power of the microscopic length scale, assuming a finite range of dependence. The results are new even for linear equations. The arguments rely on a new geometric quantity which is controlled in part by adapting elements of the regularity theory for the Monge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are then two main analytic ingredients we need to conclude: first, an estimate on the decay of the Green's function for the heterogenous operator (note that, in contrast to the divergence form case, there is no useful deterministic bound on the decay of the Green's function); and (ii) a higher-order regularity theory asserting that, with high P-probability, solutions of our random equation are more regular than the deterministic regularity theory would predict. We prove each of these estimates by using the suboptimal (but algebraic) quantitative homogenization result of [4]: we show that, since solutions are close to those of the homogenized equation on large scales, we may "borrow" the estimates from the constant-coefficient equation. This is an idea that was introduced in the context of stochastic homogenization for divergence form equations by the first author and Smart [5] (see also [17,3]) and goes back to work of Avellaneda and Lin [6,7] in the case of periodic coefficients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are then two main analytic ingredients we need to conclude: first, an estimate on the decay of the Green's function for the heterogenous operator (note that, in contrast to the divergence form case, there is no useful deterministic bound on the decay of the Green's function); and (ii) a higher-order regularity theory asserting that, with high P-probability, solutions of our random equation are more regular than the deterministic regularity theory would predict. We prove each of these estimates by using the suboptimal (but algebraic) quantitative homogenization result of [4]: we show that, since solutions are close to those of the homogenized equation on large scales, we may "borrow" the estimates from the constant-coefficient equation. This is an idea that was introduced in the context of stochastic homogenization for divergence form equations by the first author and Smart [5] (see also [17,3]) and goes back to work of Avellaneda and Lin [6,7] in the case of periodic coefficients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the estimate (1.4) is a quantitative homogenization result for this particular problem which asserts that the speed of homogenization is O(E(ε)). Moreover, it is well-known that estimating the speed of homogenization for the Dirichlet problem is essentially equivalent to obtaining estimates on the approximate correctors (see [15,7,11,4]). Indeed, the estimate (1.4) can be transferred without any loss of exponent to an estimate on the speed of homogenization of the Dirichlet problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more probabilistic viewpoint of stochastic homogenization of linear elliptic equations may be found e. g. in [21]. For the case of fully nonlinear elliptic equations, we refer to the works of Caffarelli and Souganidis [9] and Armstrong and Smart [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that further regularity properties of random elliptic operators have been explored in numerous previous works: Marahrens and the fourth author [20] have established a C 0,α regularity theory on large scales. Armstrong and Smart [3] developed a large-scale Lipschitz regularity theory; motivated by their work, Gloria, Neukamm, and the fourth author [15] have established a C 1,α theory. In a recent work of the third and the fourth author [12], higher-order homogenization correctors have been introduced for the first time in the setting of stochastic homogenization to develop a large-scale C k,α regularity theory; however, the focus being on the regularity result, the estimates on the higher-order correctors in [12] are non-optimal in the case of fast decorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%