2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15545-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Stochastic Homogenization and Large-Scale Regularity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
379
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
8
379
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the linearized equations presented in the theorems above allow us to develop a higher regularity theory for solutions of the nonlinear equation on large scales, in analogy to the role of the Schauder theory in the resolution of Hilbert's 19th problem on the regularity of solutions of nonlinear equations with smooth (or constant) coefficients. This result generalizes the large-scale C 1,1 -type estimate proved in our previous paper [1] to higher-order regularity as well as the result in the linear case [4,Theorem 3.6].…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of the linearized equations presented in the theorems above allow us to develop a higher regularity theory for solutions of the nonlinear equation on large scales, in analogy to the role of the Schauder theory in the resolution of Hilbert's 19th problem on the regularity of solutions of nonlinear equations with smooth (or constant) coefficients. This result generalizes the large-scale C 1,1 -type estimate proved in our previous paper [1] to higher-order regularity as well as the result in the linear case [4,Theorem 3.6].…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 87%
“…See [4,Theorem 3.8] for the full statement, which was first proved in the periodic setting by Avellaneda and Lin [8]. Subsequent versions of this result, which are based on the ideas of [7,8] in their more quantitative formulation given in [6], were proved in various works [17,15,2], with the full statement here given in [3,10].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations