2013
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers

Abstract: Single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a powerful tool to reveal cellular heterogeneity, discover new cell types and characterize tumor microevolution. However, losses in cDNA synthesis and bias in cDNA amplification lead to severe quantitative errors. We show that molecular labels--random sequences that label individual molecules--can nearly eliminate amplification noise, and that microfluidic sample preparation and optimized reagents produce a fivefold improvement in mRNA capture efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
997
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,055 publications
(1,013 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
997
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality control for exclusion of debris or doublets was performed after each capture experiment. Following lysis, cDNA synthesis, amplification, and tagmentation, high‐throughput RNA sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Islam et al , 2014). Next, the dataset was processed with the BackSpinV2 algorithm (Romanov et al , 2017a,b) and first grouped for main cell lineages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality control for exclusion of debris or doublets was performed after each capture experiment. Following lysis, cDNA synthesis, amplification, and tagmentation, high‐throughput RNA sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Islam et al , 2014). Next, the dataset was processed with the BackSpinV2 algorithm (Romanov et al , 2017a,b) and first grouped for main cell lineages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These protocols also allow the entire transcriptome of large numbers of single cells to be assayed in an unbiased way. This was initially done using microarrays 10,11 but is more often now done using next-generation sequencing [12][13][14][15] . Such approaches have been used to model early embryogenesis in the mouse 16 and to investigate bimodality in gene expression patterns of differentiating immune cell types 17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the apparent heterogeneity in gene expression is simply due to technical issues, the data can lead to erroneous conclusions of biological heterogeneity. Other methods include the use of unique molecular identifiers in the primers for counting individual transcripts 37. In cases in which replicate measurements can be performed, such as has been shown with single cell proteomics,38 duplicate proteomic measurements from individual cells can be performed.…”
Section: Unique Challenges and Opportunities Posed By Single‐cell Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex protein expression (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%