2017
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1918-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative simulation of C budgets in a forest in Heilongjiang province, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual NPP from 2000 to 2015 in HLJFI was produced by Wang et al (2017) using the Integrated Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon (InTEC) model. The InTEC model has been validated and applied widely (Ju et al 2007;Zhang et al 2012Zhang et al , 2015.…”
Section: Npp Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual NPP from 2000 to 2015 in HLJFI was produced by Wang et al (2017) using the Integrated Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon (InTEC) model. The InTEC model has been validated and applied widely (Ju et al 2007;Zhang et al 2012Zhang et al , 2015.…”
Section: Npp Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractions of clay, silt, and sand were obtained from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) constructed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the International Institute [45].All of these spatial datasets were employed in the UTM WGS-84 coordinate system and interpolated to 1 km resolution. Detailed descriptions of datasets were reported elsewhere [46,47].…”
Section: Model Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [40] produced a NPP distribution map in 2003 using the BEPS model, and the reference year NPP data were used to calibrate the initial value of NPP in InTEC.…”
Section: Input Data In the Intec Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated NPP in this study was validated using NPP database created by Yu based on field measurements, which has been widely used to validate forest NPP [40,50]. The MAE% of our estimation of stand NPP ranged from 46% to 73%, with a mean of about 59%.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%