2023
DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative sensory testing as an assessment tool to predict the response to standard pain treatment in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen,
Kübra Kilic,
Emma Hertel
et al.

Abstract: Emerging evidence suggest that quantitative sensory testing (QST) may predict the treatment response to pain-relieving therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis focus on the predictive value of QST for pain management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for all studies from year 2000 to 2023 on pretreatment QST and treatment of OA including surgical, pharmaceutical, and nonsurgical and nonpharmaceutical therapies. Preclinical studies and reviews were excluded.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, quantitative sensory testing (QST) has been studied as a possible predictor for TKR success given its ability to directly quantify aspects related to the pathophysiology of chronic pain, including allodynia, hyperalgesia, temporal summation (TS) of nociception, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as proxies for sensitization of the nociceptive apparatus [6]. While many KOA patients present QST abnormalities in comparison to healthy individuals [7, 8], including widespread pressure hyperalgesia, facilitated TS, and impaired CPM [6, 9, 10], QST scores can be variable, and this variability has been suggested to be associated with the outcomes of interventions[11]. A recent systematic review supports that preoperative pain pressure threshold (PPT), TS, and CPM are the most frequently associated with chronic postoperative pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, quantitative sensory testing (QST) has been studied as a possible predictor for TKR success given its ability to directly quantify aspects related to the pathophysiology of chronic pain, including allodynia, hyperalgesia, temporal summation (TS) of nociception, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as proxies for sensitization of the nociceptive apparatus [6]. While many KOA patients present QST abnormalities in comparison to healthy individuals [7, 8], including widespread pressure hyperalgesia, facilitated TS, and impaired CPM [6, 9, 10], QST scores can be variable, and this variability has been suggested to be associated with the outcomes of interventions[11]. A recent systematic review supports that preoperative pain pressure threshold (PPT), TS, and CPM are the most frequently associated with chronic postoperative pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QST scores can be variable, and this variability has been suggested to be associated with the outcomes of interventions [11]. A recent systematic review supports that preoperative pain pressure threshold (PPT), TS, and CPM are the most frequently associated with chronic postoperative pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%