2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibody Response in COVID-19 Patients Using Three Fully Automated Immunoassays and a Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test

Abstract: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays against the spike (S) protein are useful for monitoring immune response after infection or vaccination. We compared the results of three chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs) (Abbott, Roche, Siemens) and a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT, GenScript) using 191 sequential samples from 32 COVID-19 patients. All assays detected >90% of samples collected 14 days after symptom onset (Abbott 97.4%, Roche 96.2%, Siemens 92.3%, and GenScript 96.2%), and overall agree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two CLIAs and two EIAs showed excellent concordance with PRNT, and moderate correlations with PRNT 50 . In addition, these binding antibody assays showed strong correlations with commercial sVNTs in vaccinated participants, as observed in previous studies of patients with COVID-19 [ 35 , 36 ]. These results show that CLIA or EIA are alternative approaches to commercially available sVNTs, consistent with a previously proposed algorithm [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Two CLIAs and two EIAs showed excellent concordance with PRNT, and moderate correlations with PRNT 50 . In addition, these binding antibody assays showed strong correlations with commercial sVNTs in vaccinated participants, as observed in previous studies of patients with COVID-19 [ 35 , 36 ]. These results show that CLIA or EIA are alternative approaches to commercially available sVNTs, consistent with a previously proposed algorithm [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the measurement of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein RBD antibodies using the assay developed by Roche appears to be associated with the levels of neutralising antibodies in a growing number of studies. [47][48][49] Another limitation of this study is that the final multiple linear regression model that was generated has an adjusted r 2 =0.14 (table 3), meaning that this model explains roughly only 14% of the variance in our data and indicates that other parameters, besides the ones already taken into consideration, should be included so as to further improve the model. Moreover, as this study was carried out during a period that the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 was the most prevalent and thus may have limited applicability in the current Omicron phase of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If desired, the World Health Organization International Standard for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin can be calculated by using the following conversion factors, as recommended by the manufacturers: BAU/mL = (U/mL) × 1 or BAU/mL = (U/mL) × 1.0288 [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%