2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative risk assessment of gas leakage and explosion accident consequences inside residential buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equation () for the Probit value Pe of overpressure is as follows 35 : Pegoodbreak=goodbreak−77.1goodbreak+6.910.35emlnnormalΔPr where Pr is the overpressure value (Pa).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation () for the Probit value Pe of overpressure is as follows 35 : Pegoodbreak=goodbreak−77.1goodbreak+6.910.35emlnnormalΔPr where Pr is the overpressure value (Pa).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method involves analyzing gas dispersion and establishing an explosion simulation model to predict the consequences of an explosion in an inhomogeneous gas cloud. Quantitatively describing the severity of the consequences of the explosion in different areas of a residence helps identify hazardous areas [11]. Using FLACS software, a simulation was conducted in a 200 m long tunnel to study the overpressure distribution and flame changes resulting from the explosion of a methane-hydrogen gas mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leakage and diffusion of hydrogen, methane, and natural gas using the CFD technique and the obtained hazardous gas concentration distribution were simulated 23–25 . Song et al 26 established a quantitative risk analysis method for gas leakage and explosion accidents in residential buildings based on the probit model, and investigated the effects of vent area ratio and broken pressure of glasses. Fiates and Vianna 27 adopted a modified solver to model the gas cloud volume in the OpenFOAM software under the same scenario as described above and analyzed five leakage directions and four wind directions at a typical industrial site, and the obtained simulation results were consistent with CFD results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%