2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-006-9058-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Recurrence and Large Deviations for Teichmuller Geodesic Flow

Abstract: We prove quantitative recurrence and large deviations results for the Teichmuller geodesic flow on connected components of strata of the moduli space Q g of holomorphic unit-area quadratic differentials on a compact genus g ≥ 2 surface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is covered in z X D by a union of graphs of Möbius transformations ‫ވ‬ ! ‫.ވ‬ We introduce these curves in Section 2.3 and show that (1)(2)(3) .P D / D 5 2 .X D /:…”
Section: Siegel-veech Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is covered in z X D by a union of graphs of Möbius transformations ‫ވ‬ ! ‫.ވ‬ We introduce these curves in Section 2.3 and show that (1)(2)(3) .P D / D 5 2 .X D /:…”
Section: Siegel-veech Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1-11) These together with (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) give us enough equations to solve for a. Theorem 1.3 follows from (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) by pairing OE! 1 with both sides as in the proof of Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Siegel-veech Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first results on exponential decay for the probabilities of return times were obtained by Jayadev Athreya [30]. In his approach, Athreya used the dynamics of SL(2, R)-action, which allowed him to obtain optimal exponents.…”
Section: Proposition 15 There Exists a Constant C Such That The Follmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that (1.2) is an immediate consequence of Theorem 1.1, which is a bit more precise. In order to prove Theorem 1.1 one needs Corollary 1.3 and certain recurrence results for geodesics, which are based on [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%