2003
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR for detection of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer using different mRNA markers

Abstract: The detection of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood from colorectal cancer patients by RT-PCR could be an attractive method for selecting patients for adjuvant therapy. We here report on real-time RT-PCR assays (LightCycler) to quantitate potential mRNA markers. We investigated specimens from colon carcinoma and normal colon mucosa tissues, cell lines, blood samples from 129 patients with colorectal cancer (all stages) and 58 reference blood samples (healthy donors, persons suffering from inflammator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies were excluded as they were reviews or systematic reviews, which did not report on prognostic outcomes (Tsavellas et al, 2001;Sleijfer et al, 2007;Riethdorf et al, 2008;Sergeant et al, 2008;Tsouma et al, 2008). Ten studies were excluded as they did not report on prognostic outcomes (Denis et al, 1997;Nakamori et al, 1997;Douard et al, 2001;Guadagni et al, 2001;Patel et al, 2002;Silva et al, 2002;Yokoyama and Yamaue, 2002;Schuster et al, 2004;Yeh et al, 2006;Lagoudianakis et al, 2009). The outcomes measured in the 14 studies included in this review were too heterogeneous with regards to the methodology of data collection to allow quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies were excluded as they were reviews or systematic reviews, which did not report on prognostic outcomes (Tsavellas et al, 2001;Sleijfer et al, 2007;Riethdorf et al, 2008;Sergeant et al, 2008;Tsouma et al, 2008). Ten studies were excluded as they did not report on prognostic outcomes (Denis et al, 1997;Nakamori et al, 1997;Douard et al, 2001;Guadagni et al, 2001;Patel et al, 2002;Silva et al, 2002;Yokoyama and Yamaue, 2002;Schuster et al, 2004;Yeh et al, 2006;Lagoudianakis et al, 2009). The outcomes measured in the 14 studies included in this review were too heterogeneous with regards to the methodology of data collection to allow quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of real-time PCR-based assays with single molecular markers, such as CEA, CK19, and CK20, demonstrated low sensitivity, ranging from 4% to 35.9%, 25.9% to 41.9%, and 5.1% to 28.3%, respectively [13] . One study, performed with a newly identified molecular marker known as ProtM [27] , also attained unsatisfactory sensitivity. Circulating cancer cells from any cancer type are capable of disseminating from solid tumor tissues, penetrating and invading blood vessels, and circulating in the peripheral blood [28][29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because KLK6 has been found to be highly expressed in colorectal cancer cells as well as in ovarian cancer cells (12,15,16), we hypothesize that KLK6 may also have potential applications in the clinical diagnosis and monitoring of colorectal cancer. To the authors' knowledge, no information has been published concerning the clinical significance of KLK6 mRNA expression in colorectal cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have reported that KLK6 mRNA is highly expressed in ovarian cancer tissues (6,12), and recent studies have indicated that hK6 could potentially be a biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of ovarian cancer (13,14). In colorectal cancer, KLK6, KLK8, and KLK10 have been found to be up-regulated in cancer tissues compared with normal tissues (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%