2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2697(02)00311-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: normalization to rRNA or single housekeeping genes is inappropriate for human tissue biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
379
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
19
379
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in agreement with our [19] as well as other [20,21] earlier reports of significant sex, hormonal and non-hormonal effects on the expression levels of such housekeeping genes as cyclophilin, tyrosine aminotransferase, β-actin, tubulin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and 18S in rat liver [19]. Accordingly, we normalized real-time PCR determined CYP2C11 mRNA concentrations to total RNA (Table 1) as we [22] and others [23] have reported.…”
Section: Sexually Dimorphic Expression Of Tubulinsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are in agreement with our [19] as well as other [20,21] earlier reports of significant sex, hormonal and non-hormonal effects on the expression levels of such housekeeping genes as cyclophilin, tyrosine aminotransferase, β-actin, tubulin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and 18S in rat liver [19]. Accordingly, we normalized real-time PCR determined CYP2C11 mRNA concentrations to total RNA (Table 1) as we [22] and others [23] have reported.…”
Section: Sexually Dimorphic Expression Of Tubulinsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…5,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Some have argued that the above-mentioned factors are academic as the overall study findings will not be affected because this variability is likely to be similar in the study and Real-time RT-PCR normalisation J Huggett et al control groups. 24 However, unless the variability is defined this argument simply does not hold.…”
Section: Normalisation; Reference Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 However, unless the variability is defined this argument simply does not hold. While genes like GAPDH have been found to be appropriate for certain experimental situations 25 21 who demonstrated that if the wrong reference gene is chosen it can result in altered findings. This occurs when the reference gene is regulated by the experimental conditions.…”
Section: Normalisation; Reference Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability may also occur when cellular signalling pathways and basic cell metabolism are disturbed (Singh and Green 1993). In addition, the expression of these reference genes may be influenced by experimental conditions (Thellin et al 1999;Selvey et al 2001;Tricarico et al 2002;Arukwe 2006;Valenti et al 2006;Tanic et al 2007), drug and hormone treatments (Bustin 2000;Gorzelniak et al 2001;Huggett et al 2005). Therefore, appropriate reference genes need to be identified and validated for every experimental design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, appropriate reference genes need to be identified and validated for every experimental design. Indeed, several studies have provided evidence that the common practice of using single reference gene for normalisation has led to inaccurate or biased target gene expression profiling (Tricarico et al 2002;Vandesompele et al 2002). Therefore, the geometric mean of multiple reference genes should be carefully selected as the internal controls for accurate and reliable normalisation in gene expression study using real-time PCR (Vandesompele et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%