2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative re-examination of Taylor model for FCC polycrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Taylor model also represent the S-D effect, however, evaluated flow stresses exceed values obtained using the proposed model, consistent with a previous study on face-centered cubic polycrystals. 15) Flow stresses under uniaxial tensions and compressions are shown in Fig. 2 for hydrostatic pressures of p = 0, 552, and 1 104 MPa along with experimental results.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Taylor model also represent the S-D effect, however, evaluated flow stresses exceed values obtained using the proposed model, consistent with a previous study on face-centered cubic polycrystals. 15) Flow stresses under uniaxial tensions and compressions are shown in Fig. 2 for hydrostatic pressures of p = 0, 552, and 1 104 MPa along with experimental results.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial crystal orientations are randomly distributed, and the number of crystal grains is set to 512, which is considered sufficient to represent the polycrystalline behavior of cubic metals. 15) …”
Section: Analysis Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yield points were defined to correspond to the 0.2% equivalent plastic strain for each loading condition. 36 A comparison of the yield loci from the phenomenological theory and the locus from the crystal plasticity theory showed a recognisable difference in the spread towards the pure shear direction and in sharpness towards the equi-biaxial tension direction.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…12 to 15), which has been often considered as an upper bound for the stresses, may contribute to explain the associated higher predicted limit strains. Recent reexamination of the Taylor model(Tadano et al, 2012) also revealed that its predictions tend to underestimate the lattice rotations. Because the latter play a major role in inducing textural (geometrical) softening that is favorable to localization, this may bring some support to the aboveobserved differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%