2017
DOI: 10.13031/trans.11465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Rapid Analysis Method for Ofloxacin in Raw Milk Based on Molecule-Specific Recognition and Electrochemical Impedance Spectrum

Abstract: Abstract. A quantitative rapid analysis method for ofloxacin detection in raw milk using molecule-specific recognition and an electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) technique was investigated in this study. An association complex (AC) formed by a combination of ofloxacin and sodium tetraphenylboron (ST) was used as the active material for electrochemical analysis. A carbon screen-printed electrode (CSE) was modified with the AC to form an electrochemical active membrane for ofloxacin detection. EIS data of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, qPCR was performed with Bestar®SybrGreen qPCR mastermix (DBI). Relative gene expressions were determined by 2 −ΔΔCt method, with circPUM1, JUNB and miR-30a-5p expression respectively normalized to GAPDH or U6 [15][16][17][18]. The primer sequences applied were as listed below: circPUM1 Forward: 5′-GATTATTCAGGCACGCAGGT-3′, Reverse: 5′-CCCTCCTCCTTCAAATCTCC-3′; JUNB Forward: 5′-GACACAGGCGCATCTCTGAAG -3ʹ,Reverse: 5′-GATCACGCCGTTGCTGTTG-3ʹ; GAPDH Forward: 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′, Reverse: 5′-ATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCAGT-3ʹ; miR-30a-5p Forward: CGCGATGTTGAAACATCCTCGAC-3ʹ, Reverse: 5ʹ-ATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG -3ʹ; U6 Forward: 5′-CCTGCGCAAGGATGAC -3′, Reverse: 5′--GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′.…”
Section: Rt-qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, qPCR was performed with Bestar®SybrGreen qPCR mastermix (DBI). Relative gene expressions were determined by 2 −ΔΔCt method, with circPUM1, JUNB and miR-30a-5p expression respectively normalized to GAPDH or U6 [15][16][17][18]. The primer sequences applied were as listed below: circPUM1 Forward: 5′-GATTATTCAGGCACGCAGGT-3′, Reverse: 5′-CCCTCCTCCTTCAAATCTCC-3′; JUNB Forward: 5′-GACACAGGCGCATCTCTGAAG -3ʹ,Reverse: 5′-GATCACGCCGTTGCTGTTG-3ʹ; GAPDH Forward: 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′, Reverse: 5′-ATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCAGT-3ʹ; miR-30a-5p Forward: CGCGATGTTGAAACATCCTCGAC-3ʹ, Reverse: 5ʹ-ATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG -3ʹ; U6 Forward: 5′-CCTGCGCAAGGATGAC -3′, Reverse: 5′--GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′.…”
Section: Rt-qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, many techniques have been used to detect glucose in human blood, such as colorimetry ( Liu et al, 2011 ), gas chromatography ( Larsen, 2015 ), fluorescence ( Xie et al, 2017 ), and electrochemical sensors ( Lpa et al, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2021 ). Among them, the accuracy of colorimetry is poor, the gas chromatography equipment is complex and expensive ( Feng et al, 2016 ; Hui and Ying, 2017 ; Wang et al, 2020 ), and the fluorescence is very sensitive to some interfering substances ( Zheng et al, 2019 ). Compared with enzyme electrochemical sensors, the non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor has the advantages of long service life, high cost performance, excellent stability, simple operation, and easy to carry ( Clark and Lyons, 2010 ; Hui et al, 2016 ; Hui et al, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2017 ; Archana et al, 2019 ; Zhao et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%