2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01509-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative proteomics strategy involving the selection of peptides containing both cysteine and histidine from tryptic digests of cell lysates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For quantitative comparison, two samples may be labeled with stable isotopes prior to sample separation, either by metabolic incorporation or through chemical derivatization. In this way, proteins derived from the different samples (e.g., normal versus abnormal or untreated versus treated samples) can be directly separated, identified, and quantified using n-D LC-MS/MS (36,303,305). A recently developed, attractive method for quantitative comparison of two proteomes is the isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) method (331).…”
Section: Vol 70 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantitative comparison, two samples may be labeled with stable isotopes prior to sample separation, either by metabolic incorporation or through chemical derivatization. In this way, proteins derived from the different samples (e.g., normal versus abnormal or untreated versus treated samples) can be directly separated, identified, and quantified using n-D LC-MS/MS (36,303,305). A recently developed, attractive method for quantitative comparison of two proteomes is the isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) method (331).…”
Section: Vol 70 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, when the peptides from the two populations labeled with the light/heavy isotope, and mixed in a 1:1 ratio, were analyzed by MS, the relative peaks will be shifted by 3 mass units, for the singly labeled, or by 6 mass units (for the doubly labeled), having an area ratio that is proportional to their relative abundance in the two sample specimens. In a second approach, the same group adopted acylation of peptides via light and heavy (deuterated) succinic anhydride (Wang & Regnier, 2001;Wang et al, 2002). Here too, a few peptides that were differentially labeled and that terminated with an Arg will exhibit monoisotopic peaks that are spaced apart by 4 a.m.u., whereas those having a Lys at their C-terminus will exhibit a difference of 8 a.m.u.…”
Section: Global Internal Standard Strategy (Gist)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide mapping and sequencing of proteins require as complete as possible fragmentation of the protein in a short time, resulting in well-defined and reproducible peptide patterns [1][2][3][4]. Regardless of the separation method, the resulting peaks profile provides for each protein a unique fingerprint for each protein called a "peptide map" [5]. efficient MS analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%