2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018sw001829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Prediction of High‐Energy Electron Integral Flux at Geostationary Orbit Based on Deep Learning

Abstract: The deep learning method of long short-term memory (LSTM) is applied to develop a model to predict the daily >2-MeV electron integral flux 1 day ahead at geostationary orbit. The inputs to the model include geomagnetic and solar wind parameters such as Kp, Ap, Dst, solar wind speed, magnetopause subsolar distance, and the value of >2-MeV electron integral flux itself over the previous five consecutive days. The model is trained on the data from the periods 1999-2007 and 2011-2016, and the efficiency of the mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It implies that this dynamics is at least partially predictable. Considering Int ( ap ) events and the related IntAE measure should therefore provide new opportunities to improve existing forecasting capabilities that rely either on complex physics‐based numerical models or on machine learning techniques (e.g., see Camporeale et al, ; Horne et al, , ; Li et al, ; Ma et al, ; Su et al, ; Wei et al, ). In particular, machine learning models that include lagged inputs will be able to integrate such geomagnetic indices automatically within their network (e.g., see Camporeale et al, ).…”
Section: Impact Of Significant Time‐integrated Ap Events At L∼42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies that this dynamics is at least partially predictable. Considering Int ( ap ) events and the related IntAE measure should therefore provide new opportunities to improve existing forecasting capabilities that rely either on complex physics‐based numerical models or on machine learning techniques (e.g., see Camporeale et al, ; Horne et al, , ; Li et al, ; Ma et al, ; Su et al, ; Wei et al, ). In particular, machine learning models that include lagged inputs will be able to integrate such geomagnetic indices automatically within their network (e.g., see Camporeale et al, ).…”
Section: Impact Of Significant Time‐integrated Ap Events At L∼42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tan et al (2018) applied the LSTM method to forecast the Geomagnetic Kp index using historical solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field and the Kp index itself as input. Wei et al (2018) were able to achieve one day lead time forecasting of high-energy electron integral flux at geostationary orbit using the LSTM deep neural network machine learning method and the Kp, Ap, Dst, solar wind speed, magnetopause subsolar distance and the 2-MeV electron integral flux itself as input.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al. (2018) were able to achieve one day lead time forecasting of high‐energy electron integral flux at geostationary orbit using the LSTM deep neural network machine learning method and the Kp, Ap, Dst, solar wind speed, magnetopause subsolar distance and the 2‐MeV electron integral flux itself as input. LSTMs are particularly popular in speech recognition, solar power forecasting, traffic prediction and others (Gensler et al., 2016; Graves et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fukata et al [33], Xue and Ye [34], Ling et al [35], Guo et al [36], and Shin et al [37] developed models by neural networks to predict ≥2 MeV electron fluences within the next 1-3 days at one location in GEO orbit. Wang et al [38] used support vector machine and Wei et al [39] used a deep learning method to predict ≥2 MeV electron fluences in the next day. These models require external parameters as inputs, such as ≥2 MeV electron daily fluences one or a few days ahead, solar wind parameters (solar wind speed and dynamic pressure, interplanetary magnetic field, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%