2008
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01843-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative PCR for Detection and Enumeration of Genetic Markers of Bovine Fecal Pollution

Abstract: Accurate assessment of health risks associated with bovine (cattle) fecal pollution requires a reliable host-specific genetic marker and a rapid quantification method. We report the development of quantitative PCR assays for the detection of two recently described bovine feces-specific genetic markers and a method for the enumeration of these markers using a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Both assays exhibited a range of quantification from 25 to 2 ؋ 10 6 copies of target DNA, with a coefficient of variati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
126
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
126
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, an IAC (UCP1) was used at the level of the qPCRs, and inhibition was evaluated based on observation of a C T value higher than that expected for the IAC (35,36). Chemical cleanup of DNA extracts from the Hillsborough River samples, which were strongly inhibitory to PCR amplification, helped to alleviate inhibition based on IAC C T values; however, the cleanup procedure did not result in consistent DNA recovery, and therefore accurate quantification of gene copies in the original sample was not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, an IAC (UCP1) was used at the level of the qPCRs, and inhibition was evaluated based on observation of a C T value higher than that expected for the IAC (35,36). Chemical cleanup of DNA extracts from the Hillsborough River samples, which were strongly inhibitory to PCR amplification, helped to alleviate inhibition based on IAC C T values; however, the cleanup procedure did not result in consistent DNA recovery, and therefore accurate quantification of gene copies in the original sample was not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All amplifications were performed in a 7900 HT Fast real-time sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). Reaction conditions and thermal cycling parameters for CowM2, CowM3, GenBac3, EC23S857, and Entero1 are reported elsewhere (14,17,18). For CampF2 Experiment controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 9 PCRbased assays were used in this study (Table 1), including four endpoint PCR assays (CF128 and CF193) and seven qPCR assays (CowM2, CowM3, Entero1, EC23S857, GenBac3, CampF2, and ttr-6) (14-21). The plasmid DNA construct used as an absolute DNA standard for the CowM2 and CowM3 qPCR assays is described elsewhere (18). Two additional plasmid constructs (Integrated DNA Technologies) were generated for the remaining qPCR assays (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and E. coli O157:H7 are two examples of bacterial pathogens that may enter VBNC states (8, 62). In addition, host-associated qPCR genetic markers are available and are reported to discriminate between human, cattle, swine, and other animal sources (4,23,25,32,35,(43)(44)(45), providing fecal pollution source information that may lead to better-informed remedial actions to improve water quality.Several of the emerging FIB and host-associated qPCR assays target gDNA from obligate anaerobic bacteria, primarily Bacteroidales. These organisms offer improved host specificity for development of host-associated qPCR assays and comprise a large fraction of the bacterial community in feces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%