2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.01.045
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Quantitative NMR in synthetic and combinatorial chemistry

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
87
18
8
5

Citation Types

2
83
1
0

Year Published

Range
2006
2006
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
95
7
5
2

Relationship

0
109

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 109 publications

(86 citation statements)
references

References 34 publications

2
83
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Expressing the accuracy for each qHNMR method as the % deviation from the concentration by weight (=100%) resulted in 100.1 ± 5.7% for the IS method (precision 94.3%), 98.7 ± 5.8% for the ES method (precision 94.2%), and 103.8 ± 14.8% for relying on the CC method (precision 85.2%). Compared with previous qHNMR reports [31,42,43], the present study found lower achievable accuracy and precision. This was mainly attributed to the complex nature of the analyzed plant extracts and fractions, which required a reduction in the size of the integral regions (ROIs) below the aforementioned 5ω̄ 1/2 threshold which has been proposed for the qHNMR of primary reference standards.…”
Section: Results
contrasting
confidence: 99%