2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09954-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative multi-parameter assessment of age- and gender-related variation of back extensor muscles in healthy adults using Dixon MR imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of changing mean diffusivity over the span of the lumbar spine may draw into question the assumption of spatial uniformity, however we note that spatial consistency was assumed within one spinal segment, not across the entire spine. Indeed, differences in IVIM parameters across the spinal segments are likely to reflect differences in structure and physiology of the paraspinal muscles from cranial to caudal, including differences in size (including the relative contribution of erector spinae vs. multifidus), tissue composition, and metabolic capacity (41)(42)(43). We also note that the IVIM parameters were generally more variable at L1 and L5, potentially due to respiratory motion at the superior extent and coil sensitivity at the inferior extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The observation of changing mean diffusivity over the span of the lumbar spine may draw into question the assumption of spatial uniformity, however we note that spatial consistency was assumed within one spinal segment, not across the entire spine. Indeed, differences in IVIM parameters across the spinal segments are likely to reflect differences in structure and physiology of the paraspinal muscles from cranial to caudal, including differences in size (including the relative contribution of erector spinae vs. multifidus), tissue composition, and metabolic capacity (41)(42)(43). We also note that the IVIM parameters were generally more variable at L1 and L5, potentially due to respiratory motion at the superior extent and coil sensitivity at the inferior extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables fat fraction (FF) mapping through chemical shift encoding, and the FF is commonly defined as the percentage of proton density of fat molecules relative to the combined proton density of water and fat molecules ( 19 , 20 ). Compared with traditional imaging techniques such as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), FF mapping by MRI can provide fast and accurate evaluation of the fat composition of the whole body, and it has been widely applied in the assessment of abdominal muscle (AM) ( 21 24 ), BMAT ( 23 25 ), and ectopic fat deposition ( 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%