Quantitative mouse brain phenotyping based on single and multispectral MR protocols

Abstract

Sophisticated image analysis methods have been developed for the human brain, but such tools still need to be adapted and optimized for quantitative small animal imaging. We propose a framework for quantitative anatomical phenotyping in mouse models of neurological and psychiatric conditions. The framework encompasses an atlas space, image acquisition protocols, and software tools to register images into this space. We show that a suite of segmentation tools (Avants, Epstein et al., 2008) designed for human neuroimaging can be incorporated into a pipeline for segmenting mouse brain images acquired with multispectral magnetic resonance imaging (MR) protocols. We present a flexible approach for segmenting such hyperimages, optimizing registration, and identifying optimal combinations of image channels for particular structures. Brain imaging with T1, T2* and T2 contrasts yielded accuracy in the range of 83% for hippocampus and caudate putamen (Hc and CPu), but only 54% in white matter tracts, and 44% for the ventricles. The addition of diffusion tensor parameter images improved accuracy for large gray matter structures (by >5%), white matter (10%), and ventricles (15%). The use of Markov random field segmentation further improved overall accuracy in the C57BL/6 strain by 6%; so Dice coefficients for Hc and CPu reached 93%, for white matter 79%, for ventricles 68%, and for substantia nigra 80%. We demonstrate the segmentation pipeline for the widely used C57BL/6 strain, and two test strains (BXD29, APP/TTA). This approach appears promising for characterizing temporal changes in mouse models of human neurological and psychiatric conditions, and may provide anatomical constraints for other preclinical imaging, e.g. fMRI and molecular imaging. This is the first demonstration that multiple MR imaging modalities combined with multivariate segmentation methods lead to significant improvements in anatomical segmentation in the mouse brain.

4D MEMRI atlas of neonatal FVB/N mouse brain development

“…One caveat that must be appreciated is that analyses of volume and intensity changes are only as accurate as the registration method employed. Registration accuracy of these algorithms has been previously assessed (Badea et al, 2012; Klein et al, 2009; Spring et al, 2007; van Eede et al, 2013) and shown to be able to detect subtle alterations (5% or less) in anatomy between mice as well as accurately segmenting anatomical brain regions (Chakravarty et al, 2013). Structure-wise analyses of brain regions, after automated segmentation, should be less sensitive to errors than voxel-wise analyses, with both methods showing promise for detecting and analyzing mutant phenotypes in the developing mouse brain (Szulc et al, 2013).…”

Effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on early postnatal rodent brain structure and diffusion properties

“…Despite this necessary design limitation, the consistency in our findings across imaging modalities would suggest that volumetric differences either do not exist or that their detection requires much higher resolution than was used by our studies. Others have reported on the comparability of various imaging methods, and found relatively high correspondence of results (Bedea et at., 2012)…”

The fornix provides multiple biomarkers to characterize circuit disruption in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

“…To evaluate regional differences in the neuroanatomy and DTI parameters between CVN-AD mice and controls, we used a segmentation pipeline (Badea et al, 2012) translated into a high-performance computing environment. We wrote Perl modules to parallelize pairwise registrations and perform voxel-based analysis on a 7-node cluster, managing SLURM jobs using Bright Cluster Manager.…”