1994
DOI: 10.1109/58.294103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative modeling of the anisotropy of ultrasonic backscatter from canine myocardium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The line profile data represents that corresponding to the bisecting line for each specimen as indicated in Figure 3b. The nature of the transmural line profiles depicted in Figures 6 appears consistent with what would be anticipated based on previously published studies examining the effects of anisotropy on ultrasonic parameters (Baldwin et al 2006; Hall et al 1997; Hoffmeister et al 1995; Kumar and Mottley 1994; Madaras et al 1988; Mottley and Miller 1988; Mottley and Miller 1990; Sosnovik et al 2001; Verdonk et al 1996). Specifically, these studies demonstrated that maximum values of apparent backscatter with minimum levels of attenuation are associated with perpendicular insonification relative to the myofibers whereas, for non-perpendicular insonification larger levels of attenuation and smaller levels of apparent backscatter are observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The line profile data represents that corresponding to the bisecting line for each specimen as indicated in Figure 3b. The nature of the transmural line profiles depicted in Figures 6 appears consistent with what would be anticipated based on previously published studies examining the effects of anisotropy on ultrasonic parameters (Baldwin et al 2006; Hall et al 1997; Hoffmeister et al 1995; Kumar and Mottley 1994; Madaras et al 1988; Mottley and Miller 1988; Mottley and Miller 1990; Sosnovik et al 2001; Verdonk et al 1996). Specifically, these studies demonstrated that maximum values of apparent backscatter with minimum levels of attenuation are associated with perpendicular insonification relative to the myofibers whereas, for non-perpendicular insonification larger levels of attenuation and smaller levels of apparent backscatter are observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…(Gong et al 2006; Hall et al 2000; Holland et al 2004; Kumar and Mottley 1994; Micari et al 2006; O'Brien et al 1995a; Rose et al 1995; Wickline et al 1985a) In addition to mechanisms associated with changes in fiber orientation, changes in myocardial blood volume, scatterer size, shape and concentration as well as relative intra- and extracellular acoustic impedances over the heart cycle may all play a role. In particular, it may be instructive to determine whether the results observed in this study are consistent with what might be anticipated based on a previously described model of the cyclic variation of backscatter properties of myocardium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the intrinsic myocardial properties (e.g., the types and concentrations of proteins present and the resulting specific intra- and extracellular viscoelastic properties) as well as the geometrical properties (structural morphology) of the myocardium, combine to produce the observed ultrasonic parameters. (Hall et al 2000; Hoyt et al 1984; Kumar and Mottley 1994; Mimbs et al 1980; O'Brien et al 1995a; O'Brien et al 1995b; Rose et al 1995; Wickline et al 1985a) For example, several studies have illustrated the relationship between the measured ultrasonic backscatter properties and collagen content in myocardial tissue. (Hall et al 2000; Hoyt et al 1984; Mimbs et al 1980; O'Donnell et al 1981; Pohlhammer and O'Brien 1981) Results demonstrated an increase in both the measured ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter correlate well with increased collagen concentration determined biochemically or histologically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-sided power distribution is typically used as a subjective description of a population for which there are only limited sample data, and especially in cases where the relationship between variables is known but data are scarce possibly because of the high cost of collection. This distribution is a generalization of the well-known uniform distribution, which has widespread applications to ultrasound, see Li et al (1992), Donohue et al (1993), Kumar and Mottley (1994), Guidi et al (1995), Kosinski et al (1996), and Narayanan et al (1997). Note that p and m are the shape parameters while a and b are the scale parameters.…”
Section: Four-parameter Two-sided Power Distributionmentioning
confidence: 96%