2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Mitral Valve Modeling Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Technique and Repeatability

Abstract: Background-Real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has the ability to construct quantitative models of the mitral valve (MV). Imaging and modeling algorithms rely on operator interpretation of raw images and may be subject to observer-dependent variability. We describe a comprehensive analysis technique to generate high-resolution 3D MV models and examine interoperator and intraoperator repeatability in humans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the results of this study demonstrate that user-initialized 3D US image analysis provides a quantitative valve assessment that is consistent with manual delineation. The errors and biases in our measurements are within the range of interobserver variability in manual image analysis presented by Jassar et al 9 and are within the range of error in annular measurements presented by Ionasec et al, 18 who use an automated image analysis technique. While the average percent difference in total tenting volume between manual and semi-automated image analysis is high (26.2%), the average percent difference in the contribution of the anterior leaflet to the total tenting volume is lower (12.2%).…”
Section: Discussion Iva Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the results of this study demonstrate that user-initialized 3D US image analysis provides a quantitative valve assessment that is consistent with manual delineation. The errors and biases in our measurements are within the range of interobserver variability in manual image analysis presented by Jassar et al 9 and are within the range of error in annular measurements presented by Ionasec et al, 18 who use an automated image analysis technique. While the average percent difference in total tenting volume between manual and semi-automated image analysis is high (26.2%), the average percent difference in the contribution of the anterior leaflet to the total tenting volume is lower (12.2%).…”
Section: Discussion Iva Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Specifically, the anterior annular points are defined as points on the anterior leaflet cm-rep boundary mapped to medial manifold edges that are not contained within the convex hull of the posterior leaflet. The anterior and posterior commissures are identified as points on the annular curve where the anterior and posterior leaflets meet, a definition that is consistent with the protocol described by Jassar et al 9 and Vergnat et al 8 An alternative definition of the commissures is described by Carpentier et al, 46 wherein several millimeters of valve tissue separates the free edge of the commissures from the annulus. Sometimes the commissures exist as separate leaflet segments, but more often the area is a subtle structure.…”
Section: Iid Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations