2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative methods for correlating dispersion and electrical conductivity in conductor–polymer nanostrand composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, tunneling could be the dominant mechanism. This conduction occur when the distances between the conductive particles are close enough, roughly less than 10 nm [40]. In addition, polymer type has a significant effect on the amount of particles required for percolation.…”
Section: Surface Resistivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, tunneling could be the dominant mechanism. This conduction occur when the distances between the conductive particles are close enough, roughly less than 10 nm [40]. In addition, polymer type has a significant effect on the amount of particles required for percolation.…”
Section: Surface Resistivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conductive particles form a continuous network inside the polymer matrix at percolation threshold. Increasing the number of particles generally has little effect on the electrical conductivity [40]. Nevertheless, a considerable decrease in the electrical resistivity of composite can be obtained by increasing the conductive particles above the percolation threshold.…”
Section: Surface Resistivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the existence of numerous publications in regard to CNT composites and their properties, reports aiming to explain the mechanisms that dominate the electrical conductivity at extremely low loading CNT values (% wt CNT below 0.1%) are scarce. It is generally agreed that the high conductivity observed even at low loadings of the conductive phase is related to (i) percolation, that is, to the formation of continuous strings of conductive material spanning in a non-conductive matrix material [5,6,7,8], (ii) a combined percolation-tunneling effect that allows electrons to hop from one conductive particle to another in close proximity [5,7,9], and/or (iii) the existence of excluded volumes in the matrix where no conductive material exists [10]. In standard percolation theory [11], based on conduction paths forming along strings of randomly placed conductive spheres in a non-conductive matrix, conductivity is only enhanced at relatively high loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the ability to model the phenomenon relies upon uniformity of the subsequent network. Dispersion trials for these materials were studied in and form the basis for the processing parameters and resultant consistent dispersion found in the materials studied in this article.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a simplified Hertz distribution for particle distribution, the probability of electron tunneling in the percolated composite, and the nodes‐link‐blobs (NLB) approach common in percolation theory , the TPM percolation model takes the form of: σσftrue(φ1φcφc1φctrue)tun+true(ad1true), φ>φc where tun is the universal critical exponent, a is the separation distance between conductors, and d is the characteristic tunneling distance of the polymer system. Typically it is assumed that the separation distance between conductors is dependent on dispersion characteristics , the thickness of the polymer layer that is adsorbed on the conductor surface , and the volume fraction (and packing arrangement) of conductor.…”
Section: Models Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%