2012
DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fes035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Methodological Dilemmas in Urban Refugee Research: A Case Study of Johannesburg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey described follows a methodology type that aimed to produce a cross-sectional sample that is sufficiently representative of the diverse migration context of South Africa [ 15 , 16 , 20 ], for example, see [ 29 33 ]. We undertook statistical analyses similar to those of previous studies that involved a comparable, non-traditional sampling approach, including studies that were also undertaken in the absence of a probability sampling frame and involved small sample sizes [ 15 , 16 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey described follows a methodology type that aimed to produce a cross-sectional sample that is sufficiently representative of the diverse migration context of South Africa [ 15 , 16 , 20 ], for example, see [ 29 33 ]. We undertook statistical analyses similar to those of previous studies that involved a comparable, non-traditional sampling approach, including studies that were also undertaken in the absence of a probability sampling frame and involved small sample sizes [ 15 , 16 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our survey had a target population with two characteristics recognized as being among the most challenging to reach: The population is mobile and marginalized (MacDonald, 2015; Vigneswaran & Quirk, 2012). An online survey with multiple entry points provided the advantage of reaching members of this target population who are not reachable in other more geographically circumscribed way (Crush et al, 2012) and who are connected to each other in highly networked ways (Friberg & Horst, 2014; Massey, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representativeness and possible biases have to be addressed within the context of any survey and scholars have pointed out that sampling respondents is one of the main challenges faced when carrying out surveys with refugees [ 30 , 48 ]. Some go as far as concluding that “representativity is an unachievable ideal in survey research on refugee populations” ([ 52 ], p. 110). Due to the paucity of data on refugees and asylum seekers from which to sample, surveys are usually based on non-probability techniques and mostly rely on access to refugees through community-based organizations or larger refugee NGOs [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%