2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8sm02121j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative mechanical analysis of indentations on layered, soft elastic materials

Abstract: Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is becoming an increasingly popular method for studying cell mechanics, however the existing analysis tools for determining the elastic modulus from indentation experiments are unable to quantitatively account for mechanical heterogeneity commonly found in biological samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bottom-effect correction models have been validated by using finite element model simulations on elastic materials. 31,32 However, an earlier bottom-effect correction model developed for a conical tip acting on an elastic material 30 fails to agree with the simulations and other models. 31,32 Living cells show a variety of viscoelastic phenomena which remain insufficiently understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bottom-effect correction models have been validated by using finite element model simulations on elastic materials. 31,32 However, an earlier bottom-effect correction model developed for a conical tip acting on an elastic material 30 fails to agree with the simulations and other models. 31,32 Living cells show a variety of viscoelastic phenomena which remain insufficiently understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The combination of the cell's softness, its finite-thickness and the rigidity of solid support has given rise to the bottomeffect artefact during the acquisition of a FDC. [29][30][31][32] This artefact makes cells to appear stiffer than they are. This effect, if it is not corrected, introduces significant quantitative errors in the determination of the Young's modulus of a cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it demands the indentation depth to be small compared to the diameter of the ball and no hysteresis side-effects should occur. The maximum indentation depth was less than 2% of the sample thickness, therefore Bueckle's indentation depth limit of 10% of the sample thickness was not exceeded (32,33,39). See paragraph "Application of the Hertz model" below for a test and discussion of the other assumptions.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Elastic Modulus Calculationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…0.3 to 2% of the sample thickness. The indentation depth was chosen to be small compared to the sample thickness (32,33). Force data was analysed in Igor Pro (Wave Metrics, USA) using custom-written software applying the Hertzian contact model (see Note S4).…”
Section: Nanomechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%