1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1996)60:8<1797::aid-qua7>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative measures of molecular similarity: Methods to analyze transition-state analogs for enzymatic reactions

Abstract: mA formalism is presented for quantifying the similarity between any two molecules. The chemical descriptor used for comparison is the molecular electrostatic potential at the van der Waals surface. Thus, both the spatial properties of a molecule and its chemical features are captured in this approach. For molecules that are geometrically alike, the most useful similarity measure stems from orienting the two species so that their physical surfaces are aligned as well as possible, without regard to chemical pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarity between Substrate , Inhibitors , and Transition State . The similarities of substrate and inhibitor to the transition state were determined with a similarity measure sensitive both to the electrostatic potential distribution on the molecular surfaces and to the surface geometries ( , ). The electron density and molecular electrostatic potentials of the molecules are calculated from ab initio techniques using Gaussian 94 ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity between Substrate , Inhibitors , and Transition State . The similarities of substrate and inhibitor to the transition state were determined with a similarity measure sensitive both to the electrostatic potential distribution on the molecular surfaces and to the surface geometries ( , ). The electron density and molecular electrostatic potentials of the molecules are calculated from ab initio techniques using Gaussian 94 ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method ranks the similarity of proposed analogs by parameters of geometry and electrostatic potential surface against the same parameters for transition-state analogs (53, 54). As geometry and electrostatics are the dominant parameters for ligand recognition, molecules more similar to the transition state are bound more tightly.…”
Section: Design Of Transition-state Analogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagdassarian et al (114,115) examined this relationship using three enzymes for which the transition state structures had been characterized by kinetic isotope effects. AMP deaminase, adenosine deaminase, and AMP nucleosidase were considered by comparing the geometric and molecular electrostatic potential surfaces of the experimentally determined transition states with the substrates and a series of inhibitors exhibiting classic competitive inhibition and slowonset, tight-binding inhibition (e.g.…”
Section: Prediction Of Inhibitory Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%