2017
DOI: 10.1364/ao.56.003929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative measurements of turbid liquids via structured laser illumination planar imaging where absorption spectrophotometry fails

Abstract: A comparison between the commonly used absorption spectrophotometry and a more recent approach known as structured laser illumination planar imaging (SLIPI) is presented for the characterization of scattering and absorbing liquids. Water solutions of milk and coffee are, respectively, investigated for 10 different levels of turbidity. For the milk solutions, scattering is the dominant process, while the coffee solutions have a high level of absorption. Measurements of the extinction coefficient are performed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objectives of this work have been achieved by the use of chlorophyll and coffee solutions at different concentration levels, and they lead satisfactory results. Note that our proposed data processing algorithms, which is based on PCA and Mean Value, made it possible to calculate extinction coefficients e µ approximately equal to those obtained with the standard method [26]. Owing to the fact that they have a good computation time and are simpler concept and implementation than the standard technique, they also lead to a minimal risk of error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objectives of this work have been achieved by the use of chlorophyll and coffee solutions at different concentration levels, and they lead satisfactory results. Note that our proposed data processing algorithms, which is based on PCA and Mean Value, made it possible to calculate extinction coefficients e µ approximately equal to those obtained with the standard method [26]. Owing to the fact that they have a good computation time and are simpler concept and implementation than the standard technique, they also lead to a minimal risk of error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the light–milk interaction will be governed by the relationship between the size of particles suspended and the wavelength of incident light [ 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Considering that the lipids have a diameter between 0.1 to 10 µm [ 7 , 9 ], and a casein protein has a diameter ranging from 50 to 680 nm [ 9 ], the milk–light interaction will be described by the Lorenz–Mie theory [ 10 ]. This considers the molecules involved as a spherical particle and the wavelength of incident light as smaller than the size of the molecules; this relationship is described by , where is the particle size, and is the wavelength of the incident light [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Optical Properties Of Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that most of the scattered light goes in a forward direction ( Figure 1 ). Besides, the milk usually has a temperature around 37 °C when it leaves the udder; then, the particles are slowly suspended and the Brownian motion is avoided [ 10 ].…”
Section: Optical Properties Of Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This technique analyzes the transmission spectra of the light that crosses the liquid sample. By using the Beer–Lambert–Bouguer law, it is possible to obtain the absorbance and correlate compounds from the sample [9]. Despite this method being widely used, the technique has undesired scattering effects produced by optically dense liquids like milk [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%