2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10113996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Measurement of the Sustainable Water Resource Development System in China Inspired by Dissipative Structure Theory

Abstract: In an attempt to ensure sustainable water resource development, this paper constructs a comprehensive scientific index evaluation system focused on the macro socio-economic-ecological environment. Inspired by the theory of dissipative structure, the sustainable development system of water resources is regarded as a complex and huge dissipative system. In order to effectively measure the coordinated development status and orderly evolution trend of the system, this paper uses the information entropy method to c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, water resources evaluation includes single-indicator evaluation and multi-indicator integrated evaluation. Single-indicator evaluation has certain limitations [13], and many scholars at home and abroad have tried to use different methods to establish an integrated multi-indicator water resources evaluation system, such as an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [14,15], pressure-state-response (PSR) [16], driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) [17,18] and socio-economic-ecological [19]. Although these studies of indicator systems have been good at evaluating water resources development and utilization, the results of different indicator systems also vary considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, water resources evaluation includes single-indicator evaluation and multi-indicator integrated evaluation. Single-indicator evaluation has certain limitations [13], and many scholars at home and abroad have tried to use different methods to establish an integrated multi-indicator water resources evaluation system, such as an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [14,15], pressure-state-response (PSR) [16], driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) [17,18] and socio-economic-ecological [19]. Although these studies of indicator systems have been good at evaluating water resources development and utilization, the results of different indicator systems also vary considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%