2018
DOI: 10.1126/science.aar5839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative mass imaging of single biological macromolecules

Abstract: The cellular processes underpinning life are orchestrated by proteins and their interactions. The associated structural and dynamic heterogeneity, despite being key to function, poses a fundamental challenge to existing analytical and structural methodologies. We used interferometric scattering microscopy to quantify the mass of single biomolecules in solution with 2% sequence mass accuracy, up to 19-kilodalton resolution, and 1-kilodalton precision. We resolved oligomeric distributions at high dynamic range, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
680
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(708 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(40 reference statements)
19
680
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscope coverglass (24 x 50mm # 1, 5 SPEZIAL, Menzel-Glaser) and APTES-functionalised coverslips were prepared as described previously (16,20). Briefly, coverslips were cleaned by sequential sonication in 2% Hellmanex (Hellma Analytics), water and iso-propanol for 10 minutes before plasma cleaning with oxygen (Diener electronic Zepto) for 8 minutes.…”
Section: Mass Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microscope coverglass (24 x 50mm # 1, 5 SPEZIAL, Menzel-Glaser) and APTES-functionalised coverslips were prepared as described previously (16,20). Briefly, coverslips were cleaned by sequential sonication in 2% Hellmanex (Hellma Analytics), water and iso-propanol for 10 minutes before plasma cleaning with oxygen (Diener electronic Zepto) for 8 minutes.…”
Section: Mass Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for differences in binding rate and thus molecule counts caused by differences in diffusion coefficient, we applied a correction to the measured mass distributions (16). We assumed that the binding rate constant scales with the diffusion coefficient, which has been reported to be roughly proportional to (base pair) -0.72 for DNA (i.e., * = α * /0.23 , where ki is the binding rate constant for DNA component i and α is a scaling factor) (21).…”
Section: Diffusion Correction and Concentration Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strikingly, iSCAT demonstrates the capability of quantitative mass measurement (Young et al, ). This differs from other single‐molecule techniques in that the signal contrast is linearly related to the polarizability and thus mass of a protein.…”
Section: Optical Mass Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several technologies have been demonstrated to detect single proteins without using fluorescent labels. [14][15][16] One is to detect refractive index changes of proteins resulted from local heating by light. 14 A more direct method is to measure protein binding to plasmonic hotspots on the nanorod surface from plasmonic absorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a light interference method has been developed to quantify the protein size based on optical scattering intensity. 16 These label-free methods are attractive for protein analysis because they measure the size, an intrinsic property of proteins. However, size alone provides only limited information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%