2017
DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201700124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Ligand Affinity Scales for Metal Triflate Salts: Application to Isomer Differentiation

Abstract: Owing to the importance of metal triflates in catalysis, the affinity of the cationic center for a selection of organic ligands was explored for InIII and ZnII triflates. The organic Lewis bases include a variety of carbonyls (amides, unsaturated ketones, a lactone) and cyclic 1,2‐diols. The relative affinity of the ligands for the cationic center in triflates was quantitatively determined on the basis of relative ion concentrations determined by electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometry. The affinity scales w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the Lewis acidity of these compounds is often based on binding constants developed from known reactions. 44,45 Notably, as mentioned above, our chromaticity trends are indeed a visual indicator fundamentally related to the binding constant of the FLAs, which further solidifies our universal-scale approach. By using our method, the strength of any given LA can be measured with only three chromaticity measurements, one from each FLA with three phosphole oxide probes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Instead, the Lewis acidity of these compounds is often based on binding constants developed from known reactions. 44,45 Notably, as mentioned above, our chromaticity trends are indeed a visual indicator fundamentally related to the binding constant of the FLAs, which further solidifies our universal-scale approach. By using our method, the strength of any given LA can be measured with only three chromaticity measurements, one from each FLA with three phosphole oxide probes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…To further expand the scope on the variation of our methodology with respect to solvent effects, the following five representative Lewis acids were chosen based on their utility in catalysis: AlCl3, B(2,4,6-C6F3H2)3, In(OTf)3, Sc(OTf)3 and Zn(OTf)2. 19,[32][33][34][35][36][37] The LAU values of these five Lewis acids were again determined using our previously reported procedure 20 and we observed the same trends as seen with B(C6F5)3 in the different solvents. LAU values were generally found to proportionally increase relative to the polarity of the respective solvent, as shown in Figure 2 and Table S3, whereas lower LAU values were observed with stronger donating solvents.…”
Section: Establishing the Impact Of Solvent On The Fla Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Sc(OTf)3 and Zn(OTf)2. 19,[32][33][34][35][36][37] The LAU values of these five Lewis acids were again determined using our previously reported procedure 20 and we observed the same trends as seen with B(C6F5)3 in the different solvents. LAU values were generally found to proportionally increase relative to the polarity of the respective solvent, as shown in Figure 2 and Table S1, whereas lower LAU values were observed with stronger donating solvents.…”
Section: Establishing the Impact Of Solvent On The Fla Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%