2014
DOI: 10.1002/fam.2278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative investigation of air gaps entrapped in multilayer thermal protective clothing in low‐level radiation at the moisture condition

Abstract: Summary The effects of air gaps entrapped within the multilayer protective clothing system on the thermal performance were studied during low‐level radiation (2–10 kW/m2). A bench‐scale apparatus was designed to produce the liquid droplets and simulate human sweat transferring through the multilayer fabric system. Two air gaps located between the outer shell and the moisture barrier (Gap A) and between the moisture barrier and the thermal liner (Gap B) were used with different gap sizes (0, 2, and 5 mm). The t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the fact that the presence of moisture can improve thermal storage capacity or heat conductivity of fabric, which corresponds with previous research. 1,30 The specific heat of moisture is 4.2 J/g C at room temperature, which is nearly two or three times that of the dry fabric. 31 The moisture's heat conductivity is 0.599 W/m C, as compared to the heat conductivity of the aramid fiber at 0.244-0.337 W/m C. Therefore, the heat conductivity of fabric containing moisture was much higher than that of dry fabric.…”
Section: Effect Of Moisture Content On Heat Flux Of Simulated Skin Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that the presence of moisture can improve thermal storage capacity or heat conductivity of fabric, which corresponds with previous research. 1,30 The specific heat of moisture is 4.2 J/g C at room temperature, which is nearly two or three times that of the dry fabric. 31 The moisture's heat conductivity is 0.599 W/m C, as compared to the heat conductivity of the aramid fiber at 0.244-0.337 W/m C. Therefore, the heat conductivity of fabric containing moisture was much higher than that of dry fabric.…”
Section: Effect Of Moisture Content On Heat Flux Of Simulated Skin Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is because more heat energy was absorbed by moisture in the fabric systems, which corresponds with previous research indicating that the presence of moisture can improve the thermal storage capacity of fabric. 24 The specific heat of moisture was 4.2 J/g ℃ at room temperature, which is nearly two to three times that of the dry fabric. 25 The obtained curves of the second stage appeared steeper, as with more absorbing heat, the fabrics transferred heat to the simulated skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, in spite of the fact that a majority of burns are caused by steam condensation, thermal protective performance is usually evaluated with dry skin models according to thermal protection standards (e.g., ISO 13506, ASTM 1930 and ASTM 2700) (8,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). To investigate the effect of perspired moisture on thermal protective performance, researchers have adapted these methods by using wet fabric systems (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) or a set-up with an adjustable microclimate relative humidity between the fabric specimen and the copper calorimeter (skin model) (29,30). Within these studies, there is no clear conclusion about the effect of moisture on thermal protective performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%