1983
DOI: 10.1190/1.1441446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative interpretation of self‐potential anomalies due to two‐dimensional sheet‐like bodies

Abstract: A method for quantitative interpretation of self‐potential anomalies due to a two‐dimensional sheet of finite depth extent is proposed. In the case of an inclined sheet, positions and amplitudes of the maximum, minimum, and zero‐anomaly points are picked and then the origin is located on the horizontal gradient curve using the template of Rao et al (1965). The parameters of the sheet may be evaluated either geometrically or by using some analytical relations among the characteristic distances. When the sheet i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SP anomaly (mV) due to an inclined 2D sheet-like structure ( Figure 1) at a point P(x) along a profile normal to the strike of the structure is given by the following formula (Jagannadha Rao et al 1993;Rao and Babu 1983;Sharma and Biswas 2013):…”
Section: Formulation Of the Forward Modeling (Direct) Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SP anomaly (mV) due to an inclined 2D sheet-like structure ( Figure 1) at a point P(x) along a profile normal to the strike of the structure is given by the following formula (Jagannadha Rao et al 1993;Rao and Babu 1983;Sharma and Biswas 2013):…”
Section: Formulation Of the Forward Modeling (Direct) Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r 1 and r 2 are the distances from the top and bottom edges of the sheet to the observation point (m), respectively, and k (k = Iρ/2π , where I is the current density and ρ is the resistivity of the surrounding medium) is the amplitude coefficient (mV) (Jagannadha Rao et al 1993;Rao and Babu 1983). Sharma and Biswas (2013) formulated the forward solution (1) in terms of the depth to the center of the sheet (z) as…”
Section: Formulation Of the Forward Modeling (Direct) Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed and discussed by many authors for interpreting the self-potential anomalies as a result of a two-dimensional inclined sheet, including, for example, logarithmic curve matching (Meiser 1962;Murty and Haricharan 1984), characteristic distances, points and curves approaches (Rao et al 1970;Paul 1965;Atchuta Rao and Ram Babu 1983), and nomograms (Ram Babu and Atchuta Rao 1988;Satyanarayana Murty and Haricharan 1985) Recently, Abdelrahman et al (1998Abdelrahman et al ( , 1999Abdelrahman et al ( , 2001) introduced the horizontal self-potential gradient and least squares approaches to interpret the self-potential anomaly due to a two-dimensional inclined sheet. The advantage of the proposed method over the previous techniques, which uses a few points, distances, and nomograms, is that all observed data can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were developed by Yüngül (1950); Paul (1965); Paul et al (1965); Rao et al . (1970); Bhattacharya and Roy (1981) and Atchuta Rao & Ram Babu (1983). The logarithmic curve matching were developed by Meiser (1962);and Murty and Haricharan, (1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%