2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative interpretation of PAMAM dendrimers adsorption on silica surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the adsorbed amount detected by QCM-D is higher than that detected from SPR. Indeed, SPR is sensitive to the "dry" mass adsorbed related to refractive index changes, while QCM-D is proportional to the hydrated mass adsorbed on the surface, which consists of the adsorbed molecules and their associated "bound" water molecules involved in hydration shells as well as the "trapped" water inside the layer structure [36,40,41].…”
Section: Hydration State Of the Adsorbed Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the adsorbed amount detected by QCM-D is higher than that detected from SPR. Indeed, SPR is sensitive to the "dry" mass adsorbed related to refractive index changes, while QCM-D is proportional to the hydrated mass adsorbed on the surface, which consists of the adsorbed molecules and their associated "bound" water molecules involved in hydration shells as well as the "trapped" water inside the layer structure [36,40,41].…”
Section: Hydration State Of the Adsorbed Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining these two techniques can provide information on the sorption mechanisms, structural changes, and obtained state of hydration of the adsorbed film. These techniques have been widely used to investigate the adsorption properties of biopolymers, proteins, and polysaccharides on various type of surfaces with or without grafting [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. A comparison of the two gums should allow their respective contribution to the surface interactions leading to adsorption to be deciphered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ammonium cations) on negatively charged surfaces (silica) [63]. For this reason, the pH the and the ionic strength of the solution exert an important influence in as much as they affect charge of the molecules and the ceramic support [64]. Organic loading is also governed by the pore parameters of each particular ceramic [65].…”
Section: Simple Coating By Absorption Of Dendritic Additives Into Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its significance, particle and bioparticle deposition has been extensively studied, using a plethora of experimental methods, such as the optical microscopy [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], scanning probe microcopies comprising atomic force microscopy (AFM) [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [ 22 , 23 ], optical techniques such as ellipsometry, reflectometry [ 24 , 25 ], light mode waveguide spectroscopy (OWLS) [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ] and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [ 30 , 31 ]. However, these techniques exhibit some limitations; in particular, they do not provide information about the adhesive contact strength among the deposited particles and the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in contrast to the streaming potential methods, the QCM signal is not directly affected by the solute or the interface charge. Because of its numerous advantages and a deceptive simplicity of measurements, the QCM method is used in numerous investigations involving nanoparticles [ 3 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], macroions [ 29 , 31 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] proteins [ 27 , 28 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ], viruses [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ], bacteria [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ], and living cells [ 78 , 79 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%