Quantitative insights into televised birth: a content analysis ofOne Born Every Minute

Abstract

This article explores birth representations through a content analysis of two seasons of the U.K. program, One Born Every Minute ( OBEM ) (Channel 4, 2010–). Reality television (RTV) has been a fertile ground for the mediation of birth, but has also stoked controversy among feminist critics and the birth community about how birth is represented and the impacts this might have for women and society. International research has explored problematic over-representation of white, heterosexual couples, as well as noting a predominance of medicalized birth experiences. However, this research is formed largely of qualitative studies that are necessarily based on small samples of episodes. To contribute to this literature, we apply a quantitative and interdisciplinary lens through a content analysis of two seasons of the U.K. version of OBEM . Paying attention to the geographical and temporal context of OBEM , this article confirms over-representation of white, heterosexual couples and medicalized birth on RTV birth shows while also providing novel insights into the ambiguous representation of birthplace and lead caregivers, the medicalization of birth through the routinization of supposedly minor birth interventions, and the absence of the representation of women’s choice over such interventions.

Can augmentation with oxytocin be ‘too much, too soon’?

“…Teijlingen et al (2009) suggest high-income countries separate birth from normal life, which reduces understanding of physiology and results in acceptance that birth, as portrayed by the mass media, is dangerous and requires technology. This is supported by De Benedictis et al's. (2018) content analysis of a popular maternity television series that reported 77% of births depicted a procedure occurring, of which 91% did not show facilitation of choice.…”

The role of pandemic‐related pregnancy stress in preference for community birth during the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States

“…Our findings suggest that women's birth preferences may be affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic and that pandemic‐related stress can contribute to shifts in childbirth practices. Women may choose where to give birth based on risk perceptions, 39‐41 with common notions that giving birth in a hospital is the safest option 42‐45 . However, the possibility of contracting the virus in the hospital appears to be shifting pregnant people's risk perceptions in complex ways that intersect with a range of pregnancy‐related beliefs and stressors.…”

Symbolic annihilation through design: Pregnancy loss in pregnancy-related mobile apps

“…Prior work has examined representations of birth, infertility, and related topics in the media (Benedictis et al, 2019; Tyler and Clements, 2009), for example, finding that women are shown to not have control over their birth interventions on TV (Benedictis et al, 2019). In the online context, Das (2017) shows how traumatic and difficult birth stories are silenced, highlighting an aversion to sharing and hearing difficult stories.…”