2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative impedimetric NPY-receptor activation monitoring and signal pathway profiling in living cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterwards, this effect diminished for concentrations up to 30 nM A2M*. Cellular alterations that could reflect this impedimetric effect course could be among others an increased cell-cell and/or cell substrate adhesion [ 14 ]. This correlates with the increased adhesion of tumour cells upon A2M* treatment ( Fig 1A ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, this effect diminished for concentrations up to 30 nM A2M*. Cellular alterations that could reflect this impedimetric effect course could be among others an increased cell-cell and/or cell substrate adhesion [ 14 ]. This correlates with the increased adhesion of tumour cells upon A2M* treatment ( Fig 1A ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we demonstrate that also the larger CD with a DP of 10 to 12 and a mixture of CD8–CD15 were not toxic to the investigated human cell lines. Sensitive techniques such as multielectrode array‐based impedimetric monitoring allowed the detection of even small changes in cellular adhesion and cell contacts . We used interdigital electrode arrays in combination with the cell lines for the sensitive impedimetric detection of cellular alterations caused by the CD .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitive techniques such as multielectrode array‐based impedimetric monitoring allowed the detection of even small changes in cellular adhesion and cell contacts . We used interdigital electrode arrays in combination with the cell lines for the sensitive impedimetric detection of cellular alterations caused by the CD . The results of impedimetric analyses obtained with CD10 are shown in Figure b and for CD11 and CD12 shown in Figure S8 in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Herein, we demonstrate that also the larger CD with aDPof10to 12 and amixture of CD8-CD15 were not toxic to the investigated human cell lines.Sensitive techniques such as multielectrode array-based impedimetric monitoring allowed the detection of even small changes in cellular adhesion and cell contacts. [22,23] We used interdigital electrode arrays in combination with the cell lines for the sensitive impedimetric detection of cellular alterations caused by the CD. [22][23][24] Ther esults of impedimetric analyses obtained with CD10 are shown in Figure 2b and for CD11 and CD12 shown in Figure S8 in the Supporting Information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22,23] We used interdigital electrode arrays in combination with the cell lines for the sensitive impedimetric detection of cellular alterations caused by the CD. [22][23][24] Ther esults of impedimetric analyses obtained with CD10 are shown in Figure 2b and for CD11 and CD12 shown in Figure S8 in the Supporting Information. Hemolytic effects of CD6-CD9 on human erythrocytes have previously been studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%