2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of Damage to Critical Memory Regions Are Associated With Post–Radiation Therapy Memory Performance in Brain Tumor Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a link between post-RT hippocampal volume and neurocognitive outcomes was found in primary brain tumours by Tringale et al [9]. They found that, in addition to diffusion biomarkers, a smaller right hippocampal volume was associated with poorer visuospatial memory performance in the 12 months after RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a link between post-RT hippocampal volume and neurocognitive outcomes was found in primary brain tumours by Tringale et al [9]. They found that, in addition to diffusion biomarkers, a smaller right hippocampal volume was associated with poorer visuospatial memory performance in the 12 months after RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, diffusion tensor imaging has shown that white matter shows dose-dependent changes in several metrics after RT [7] . Finally, two grey matter structures, the hippocampus [8] , [9] and the amygdala [10] , show susceptibility to radiation damage, again with higher volume changes with increasing dose. Furthermore, the dose to the hippocampus has been shown to negatively affect neurocognitive outcome after RT [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this contribution was to unsystematically highlight some methodological issues observed within the literature about the cognitive consequences of cranial irradiation for oncological management (Gondi et al, 2010 , 2012 , 2014 ; Kim et al, 2018 ; Acharya et al, 2019 ; Tringale et al, 2019 ). We advocate that much of the debate and many of the controversial results found within and across these studies are mainly based on such issues; the patients with disease of different clinical stages, the timing of neuropsychological assessment, and the absence of guidelines about the neuropsychological battery to employ for assessing the outcomes make it difficult to compare studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cranial irradiation literature, even if the RCI is not the standard approach to assess whether patients have been diagnosed as cognitively worsened (or improved), some studies have employed this index (Chang et al, 2009 ; Gondi et al, 2014 ; Tringale et al, 2019 ). For example, Gondi et al ( 2014 ), on the basis of a version of RCI, adopted a drop of at least two, three, or five points from baseline on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised (Benedict et al, 1998 ) for immediate recognition, delayed recall, and total recall, respectively.…”
Section: Clinical Significance: the Reliable Change Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation