2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China's southeast coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the research scale on rural function tends to be meso and macro (regional, provincial, municipal, etc.) [41,43,45], and less from the micro level (town, village). The lack of current micro-level studies has led to a gap in theories at the implementation level, such as the determination of village characteristics and development direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the research scale on rural function tends to be meso and macro (regional, provincial, municipal, etc.) [41,43,45], and less from the micro level (town, village). The lack of current micro-level studies has led to a gap in theories at the implementation level, such as the determination of village characteristics and development direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Analysis of the Interaction between High-Value Functions As an organism, there are considerable interactions among different functions in a town. For towns with two or more high-value functions, the final dominant function will be determined by the analysis of the interaction among/between different high-value functions [41].…”
Section: Functional Calculation and Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Atalay, 2016;Mary Silpa & Nowshaja, 2016) Klasifikasi kemampuan lahan dilakukan dengan mencocokan hasil analisis di daerah penelitian dengan menggunakan kriteria klasifikasi kemampuan lahan (Arsyad 2010;Atalay, 2016;Mary Silpa & Nowshaja, 2016) Kerusakan sumberdaya lahan yang banyak terjadi di bagian hulu Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) terjadi akibat dari kegiatan manusia yang tidak memperhatikan kemampuan lahan tersebut (Asdak, 2002;Chen et al, 2019;Hengkai et al, 2020). Apabila keadaan ini terus berlangsung tanpa memperhatikan kelas kemampuan lahannya akan mempengaruhi fungsi produksi, fungsi ekologis dan fungsi hidrologis (World Bank, 1993;Wiederholt et al, 2020;Zou et al, 2020). Oleh karena itu pengelolaan DAS diperlukan untuk mengembalikan serta melestarikan fungsi utama DAS untuk mendapatkan manfaat produksi dan jasa tanpa menyebabkan terjadinya kerusakan sumberdaya air dan tanah (Sulastri, et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2020;Thakur et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…On one hand, the current theoretical research on land-use transition at a village scale largely focuses on the coupling relationship between land-use transition and rural transformation [13] and rural economy [14], on the relationship between land-use transition and rural revitalization [15] and rural spatial governance [16], and also on analysis framework of land-use transition in certain regions [17], etc. On the other hand, empirical research mainly includes the evolution and mechanism of spatial differentiation and reconstruction [3,18,19], the landuse change of typical villages [20][21][22], and transformation of land-use function [23][24][25]. However, despite great emphasis put on the dominant morphology of land use in the study of rural land-use transition, the current pool of research on recessive morphology is limited to the function of land use and ignores the roles played by other recessive factors that also contribute to rural transformation, such as the management modes and land ownership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%