2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.10879
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative homogenization for the obstacle problem and its free boundary

Abstract: In this manuscript we prove quantitative homogenization results for the obstacle problem with bounded measurable coefficients. As a consequence, large-scale regularity results both for the solution and the free boundary for the heterogeneous obstacle problem are derived.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works that are closest to ours are [12] and [1]. Our results quantify the qualitative convergence results obtained in [12], and we go further by establishing the convergence of the bulk free boundary of the oscillatory obstacle problem to the free boundary of the unperturbed problem.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The works that are closest to ours are [12] and [1]. Our results quantify the qualitative convergence results obtained in [12], and we go further by establishing the convergence of the bulk free boundary of the oscillatory obstacle problem to the free boundary of the unperturbed problem.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our results quantify the qualitative convergence results obtained in [12], and we go further by establishing the convergence of the bulk free boundary of the oscillatory obstacle problem to the free boundary of the unperturbed problem. The recent work [1] establishes a large scale regularity theory for the obstacle problem with an oscillatory divergence-form elliptic operator. They make an assumption on "compatibility" of the obstacle with the operator, which avoids the kind of oscillatory contact set that we study here.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%