2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody levels in the natural history of hepatitis B virus infection

Abstract: We previously demonstrated that pretreatment quantitative anti-hepatitis B core protein (qAnti-HBc) levels can predict the treatment response for both interferon and nucleoside analogue therapy, but the characteristics of qAnti-HBc during chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remain poorly understood. To understand this issue, the qAnti-HBc levels were evaluated in individuals with past HBV infection, occult HBV infection and chronic HBV infection in the immune tolerance phase, immune clearance phase, low-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
119
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our validation study confirms in well characterized HBsAg-carriers infected with genotype-D-HBV the results obtained in Asian patients infected with genotype B and C [21]; the highest levels of total-anti-HBc were detected in CHB, both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative and the lowest levels in inactive-carriers (Fig 1). Very low levels of the antibody were reported in the non-inflammatory, HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant-phase in genotype-B and-C infections [21][22][23]. Consistently in our HBeAg-positive-carriers total-antiHBc levels comparable to those of inactive-carriers were found only in an immune-tolerant carrier, whereas the remaining CHB-patients showed high antibody levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our validation study confirms in well characterized HBsAg-carriers infected with genotype-D-HBV the results obtained in Asian patients infected with genotype B and C [21]; the highest levels of total-anti-HBc were detected in CHB, both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative and the lowest levels in inactive-carriers (Fig 1). Very low levels of the antibody were reported in the non-inflammatory, HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant-phase in genotype-B and-C infections [21][22][23]. Consistently in our HBeAg-positive-carriers total-antiHBc levels comparable to those of inactive-carriers were found only in an immune-tolerant carrier, whereas the remaining CHB-patients showed high antibody levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, in HBeAgnegative CHB patients undergoing antiviral treatment HBsAg kinetics vary according to HBV genotype and genotype-specific monitoring timeframes and end-of-treatment thresholds have yet to be standardized for a proper response-guided treatment 19]. Recently a new assay based on double antigen sandwich method that detects total (IgG and IgM) anti-HBc was developed and proposed to monitor patients, chronically infected with genotype B and C HBV undergoing antiviral therapy [21][22][23][24]. We tested this assay in a validation study on a panel of sera from well characterized genotype D, HBsAg carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No cutoff value can confidently predict the disease activity due to significant overlap of HBsAg levels among patients with active and inactive diseases [14]. Furthermore, there is little information about hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) levels in the natural history of CHB [15,16]. And no data are available on hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) for differentiation of the natural phases of HBV infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity limit was 0.25 mg/L and the upper limit was set at 18 mg/L. The patients were categorized into four groups, based on the clinical phase of HBV infection (i.e., immunetolerant, immune-clearance, HBeAg-negative, and lowreplicative phases), according to the criteria presented in Table 1 (16,17). The classification of these patients was in accordance with the European association for the study of the liver (EASL) criteria presented in 2012 (18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%