2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17860-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Geosciences: Data Analytics, Geostatistics, Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent that in the years 1990-2011 subsidence values consistently increase from -234.0 mm in 1990, through -589.6 mm in 2003 (at the maximum number (35) of deep-seated BMs on the structure) to -845.5 mm in 2011 (the largest subsidence in the geodetic monitoring history). A similar tendency as in the case of total vertical displacements uz c of the BMs on the structure, is also observed for average values, which changed from -98.0 to -275.9 mm over the years 1990 ÷ 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is apparent that in the years 1990-2011 subsidence values consistently increase from -234.0 mm in 1990, through -589.6 mm in 2003 (at the maximum number (35) of deep-seated BMs on the structure) to -845.5 mm in 2011 (the largest subsidence in the geodetic monitoring history). A similar tendency as in the case of total vertical displacements uz c of the BMs on the structure, is also observed for average values, which changed from -98.0 to -275.9 mm over the years 1990 ÷ 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They are also used in thematic cartography, e.g. to mapping hydrocarbon reservoirs, and in the oil and natural gas extraction industry [35]. In hydrogeology, they are used to model the properties (permeability and porosity), geometry and hydraulic parameters of aquifers and to assess the pollution of the soil-water environment, soils and groundwater, f.g. by heavy metals content [18, [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to estimating a causal effect, the domain of prediction serves the purpose of using available information at a given time to predict an outcome of interest without making inferences about causality, and thus does not require knowledge about the causal structure of the data. Machine learning algorithms are increasingly used to optimize prediction (Ma 2019). The application of machine learning methods to address a causal question can result in biased estimates when the variables used for prediction are the consequences of at least two causes, also called collider bias (Munafo et al 2018).…”
Section: Use Of Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship among productivity, covariates, and treatment may indeed not be linear, and interactions between variables, if existing, are not accounted for. Collinearity between variables may also bias causal estimation (Ma 2019). The last section of this paper briefly discusses the limitations of causal inference and the differences to more advanced regression techniques such as machine learning algorithms.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Marcellus Playmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The denominator n e is sometimes exchanged with n e − 1, what is called Bessel's correction [14] [15] and is useful to remove part of standard deviation estimator bias when ne is small. We are not going to use Bessel's correction in this article, as it is not relevant for image segmentation.…”
Section: Didactic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%