2019
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of variables to student success in a mastery learning baccalaureate nursing programme

Abstract: Aim This study evaluated the relationship of student input and throughput variables in a mastery learning baccalaureate nursing programme to licensure success. Design This study used a quantitative, correlational design. Methods Retrospective analysis of records of 367 graduates over a 6‐year period tested the relationship of pass rate on the licensing examination to six variables: overall pre‐admission grade point average, entrance assessmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Universities traditionally select students based on their year 12 secondary school performance. Our findings support those from studies in Pakistan ( 16 ), New Zealand ( 17 ), and the USA ( 18 ) of a positive predictive validity of secondary school performance with students' academic performance. Conversely, an Australian study ( 19 ) found no correlation between secondary school scores and first-year results, although that particular study did not focus on the final course results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Universities traditionally select students based on their year 12 secondary school performance. Our findings support those from studies in Pakistan ( 16 ), New Zealand ( 17 ), and the USA ( 18 ) of a positive predictive validity of secondary school performance with students' academic performance. Conversely, an Australian study ( 19 ) found no correlation between secondary school scores and first-year results, although that particular study did not focus on the final course results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%