2019
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2018.2873489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Evaluation of Skin Surface Roughness Using Optical Coherence Tomography <italic>In Vivo </italic>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst there are many different roughness parameters in use, the arithmetic mean roughness ( Sa ) is by far the most common parameter. In this study, we used Sa to represent skin surface roughness as well as International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 25178 standard definitions for Sa , that is, the arithmetic mean of absolute values of heights within a 3D volume [26,27]. Sa can be expressed as Sa = 1 N x × N y i = 1 N x j = 1 N y | I false( x i , y j false) | where N x and N y , respectively, represent the number of array pixels for the field‐of‐view (9 ×9 mm), that is, N x × N y indicates the total pixel number in the field‐of‐view, and I ( italicx italici , italicy italicj ) indicates the vertical distances from the pixel point to the mean height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst there are many different roughness parameters in use, the arithmetic mean roughness ( Sa ) is by far the most common parameter. In this study, we used Sa to represent skin surface roughness as well as International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 25178 standard definitions for Sa , that is, the arithmetic mean of absolute values of heights within a 3D volume [26,27]. Sa can be expressed as Sa = 1 N x × N y i = 1 N x j = 1 N y | I false( x i , y j false) | where N x and N y , respectively, represent the number of array pixels for the field‐of‐view (9 ×9 mm), that is, N x × N y indicates the total pixel number in the field‐of‐view, and I ( italicx italici , italicy italicj ) indicates the vertical distances from the pixel point to the mean height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the ScanIP module of the Simpleware software (Synopsys Corporate, Mountain View, California) suite was used to segment the different layers of the skin. Then, assuming that the effective contact area between the skin and NaPy‐loaded dressing will strongly affect the resulting NaPy concentrations within the skin, we investigated its effect through the initial roughness level of the stratum corneum (SC): A roughness criterion (R) was set as the maximal vertical distance between the top of the highest fold and the bottom of the lowest valley of the SC, and the four areas of interest were chosen so that R 1 = 20 μm, R 2 = 30 μm, R 3 = 40 μm, and R 4 = 50 μm (Figure B,C; R 1 and R 2 are from the same subject, and likewise, R 3 and R 4 are from the same other individual) . Then, we assigned constant minimal thickness to the anatomical model variants so that each of the variants was 1 mm × 3 mm × 0.05 mm and included the SC, epidermis, and dermis layers (Figure B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Organization for Standardization provides us with several criteria that characterize the degree of roughness, from which the average roughness is adopted in this study to express the magnitude of AS roughness. 5 Equation (2) defines the definition of the average roughness R a : E Q -T A R G E T ; t e m p : i n t r a l i n k -; e 0 0 2 ; 1 1 6 ; 7 3 5…”
Section: As Parameter Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16] Among them, OCT is a promising technique that can realize non-invasive, realtime three-dimensional (3D) imaging in the order of micrometers in biological tissues, and can detect structural information of samples. [17][18][19][20][21] Askaruly et al 5 performed skin boundary recognition on OCT images and calculated skin roughness based on the definition of the ISO 25178part 2 standard. By comparing with the results of PRIMOS skin measurement equipment, it can be considered that the 3D volume and depth imaging capabilities of OCT can reduce image artifacts, demonstrating the potential of OCT for providing reliable and quantitative skin surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%