2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Evaluation of Quality Loss for Nominal-the-best Quality Characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated consumer loss (Lc) for this optimization model is Rs.3000 [17] (consumer loss involves the cost of repairing, replacement of an items and other related cost derived from customer complaints at level of 50%). The consumer tolerance (Tol) for responses in this study is estimated as difference between upper limit and nominal value.…”
Section: Description Of Parametric Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated consumer loss (Lc) for this optimization model is Rs.3000 [17] (consumer loss involves the cost of repairing, replacement of an items and other related cost derived from customer complaints at level of 50%). The consumer tolerance (Tol) for responses in this study is estimated as difference between upper limit and nominal value.…”
Section: Description Of Parametric Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taguchi's QLF was applied to the quality evaluation of axles’ production in five different industries, which shows that it is very important to use the QLF to analyse and quantify the quality loss 12 . Based on Taylor's expansion theory, when the cubic QLF is established, the calculation results are more accurate than the quadratic QLF's.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%